.
Thank you for visiting. Please tell others about this website.
If you're willing to buy a single book on 9/11,  let it be this one.
Suggestion: treat
THIS 72-minute video as an overview.


9-11 Review DOT NET


New York City: September 11, 2001

"The public has a duty to watch its Government 
closely  and  keep  it  on  the  right  track." 

-- Lt. Gen. Kenneth A. Minihan, USAF

Victims of the World Trade Center attack, listed by employer.
112 Firms supposedly operating in the WTC's high Towers were not known to Dunn & Bradstreet.
The Barry Jennings Mystery
Jennings, a city official, witnessed explosions in WTC7 (47 floors) before
Towers 1 & 2 fell. This contradicted the official story and he died
before he could challenge NIST's final report on WTC7.
A private investigator was hired to examine 
Jenning's death, but he was evidently
threatened and backed out.
 .

If the picture below doesn't catch 
your serious attention, nothing will !

Ground Floor "Hit Point" at the Pentagon

(Quote:) This "hit point" was too small to accommodate a 100-ton 
airliner with a 125' wingspan and a tail that stands 44' above the ground. 
The debris is wrong for a Boeing 757: no wings, no fuselage, no seats,
no bodies, no luggage, no tail! Not even the engines, which are made 
of titanium and steel, were recovered. (End quote)
Source

(Quote:) During an appearance on [a radio program], USAF Col. George Nelson (Ret.), a 30 year veteran, aircraft accident investigator and expert in aircraft maintenance and aircraft identification, stunned listeners by stating that in regard to the 911 attack at the Pentagon, "I didn't see any damage on the sides of that hole, anything that would say that an airplane that size could have gone through a 16 or 18 ft. hole." He was referring to the hole seen at the Pentagon before the collapse of the e-ring. He went on to say, "There would be large parts of that wing lying on the ground on the outside. It wouldn't all go through that hole. (End quote.) Source

Click here to see more photos of the small entry hole in the wall of the Pentagon.

Click here to view short video clip of CNN reporter describing Pentagon strike on 9/11.

Recommended book:
Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11

.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW A PHENOMENAL VIDEO
PRODUCED BY ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH
.

It's a fact that people tend to not believe what they do not want to believe.
You might deem it appropriate to throw your open-mind toggle switch
in assessing material presented here.

"Truth" is that which is real, the quality of being genuine, factual, actual. A "theory" 
is a speculative statement or opinion based on inconclusive evidence, not on hard facts.

A theory may or may not be true. When a preponderance of facts prove
an idea to be genuine and actual, it is just plain wrong for opponents of that
proved idea to paint it as only a theory with intent to commit self-serving deception.

Bush Junior and others who employ the term "conspiracy theorists" are 
using the old, devious debate tactic of "if you can't convince them, confuse them."
Also the old, devious tactic of "destroy the messenger to make the message go away."
.
G.P. Felton, BS in Education, SUNY, publisher of this website.

.
During late 2001and early 2002, the Fire Department of New York interviewed 503 
firefighters and medical workers who were at the World Trade Center on 9/11/01. 
Those oral histories were not publicly released until August 12, 2005.
"
... the city of New York would not release them until it was forced to do so.
Early in 2002, the New York Times requested copies under the freedom of information act, 
but Mayor Michael Bloomberg's administration refused. So the Times, joined by several
families of 9/11 victims, filed suit. After a long process, the city was finally ordered
by the New York Court of Appeals 
to release the records ..." 

See source
here
.
Thanks to the New York Times, the actual oral histories are online here.
.


Dear Viewer:
If your time is limited, please sample this CBS '60 Minutes' video which reports Bush's thinking about Iraq at the time of his first National Security Council meeting in January 2001:

http://www.theroadtothehorizon.org/2008/06/news-in-case-you-still-doubt-iraq-war.html
                                                                              
"Specifically interesting is the mention of [Bush Junior] asking his National Security Council to 'find a way' to invade Iraq during their first meeting in January 2001. That is 8 months before 9/11."
About the United States National Security Council
  .

 If you do not have 14 minutes for the video, 
 take just 2 minutes to read this: 

Many Americans are content with the 9/11 Commission Report, but the two chairmen of the commission, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton are not. 

Neither was commission member Max Cleland, a US Senator who resigned from the 9/11 Commission, telling the Boston Globe (November 13, 2003): “This investigation is now compromised.” 

Even former FBI director Louis Freeh wrote in the Wall Street Journal (November 17, 2005) that there are inaccuracies in the commission’s report and “questions that need answers.”

Both Kean and Hamilton have twice stated publicly, once in their 2006 book, "Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission," and again in (January 2, 2008), the New York Times, that there are inaccuracies in their report and unanswered -- or mis-answered -- questions.

On the second day of this new year [2008], Kean and Hamilton accused the CIA of obstructing their investigation: “What we do know is that government officials decided not to inform a lawfully constituted body, created by Congress and the President, to investigate one of the greatest tragedies to confront this country. We call that obstruction.”

In their book, Kean and Hamilton wrote that they were unable to obtain “access to star witnesses in custody who were the only possible source for inside information about the 9/11 plot.”

The only information the commission was permitted to have about what was learned from interrogations of alleged plot ringleaders, such as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, came from “thirdhand” sources. The commission was not permitted to question the alleged plotters in custody or even to meet with those who interrogated the alleged plotters.

Consequently, write Kean and Hamilton, “We had no way of evaluating the credibility of detainee information” that was fed to them by third party hands. “How could we tell if someone such as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was telling us the truth?”

The fact that video tapes of the interrogations existed was kept secret from the 9/11 Commission. The video tapes have since been destroyed.

~~~ The above is quoted material. See source here . ~~~

~ About Paul Craig Roberts
~ Recommended reading: David Ray Griffin's book criticizing the official report


What kind of government do we have when heavyweight 
evidence in a mass murder incident is kept from the officials
 investigating that incident -- and then destroyed? 
Obvious answer: Government that can not be trusted or respected!
 Government that cries for a serious overhaul! ~ Publisher
 
.

Many hard facts 
disprove the government's official story !

George W. Bush Junior and Dick Cheney 
are challenged to voluntarily undergo credible polygraphs 
about their knowledge of  the 9/11 attacks.

Click here for information proving Bush Junior is an habitual liar.

Click here for info about a David Ray Griffin book that discloses facts including: Bush Junior's own brother was "in charge of the company that oversaw security at the WTC".
.
Government employees are hired help, no matter how impressive their titles may be. When they lie or hide details of our business from us, they usurp our sovereignty and commit a form of treason! When they cause false-flag atrocities to manipulate public thinking, they must be held accountable. .


     CONTEXT OF 911

    "In President Eisenhower's farewell address, he cautioned us:

            In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition  
            of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-
            industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced 
            power exists and will persist.


    Eisenhower was frustrated with the inability to control the Department of Defense 
    (DoD), and  the revolving door that existed between the personnel of the
    Pentagon and the defense contractors. He also realized how the media could
    shape our image of war (Pearl Harbor effect). This powerful combination of the
   defense industry with the media's ability to control how people will perceive/react
    to a 'catastrophic and catalyzing event' -- would have immense consequence to
    humankind."
.
   
    ~ Drawn from 9-11 Coup Against America: The Pentagon Analysis, by Peter Tiradera, M.D.,
           a retired Air Force officer.
See Amazon to purchase book.


    "It is part of the general pattern of misguided policy that our country is now geared to
     an arms economy which was bred in an artificially induced psychosis of war hysteria
     and nurtured upon an incessant propaganda of fear." 

           ~ General Douglas MacArthur, Speech, May 15, 1951


Basics of 9/11 were previously conceived by the Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1962 for dealing with Castro, but not executed. "Code named Operation Northwoods, the plan, which had the written approval of the Chairman [Gen. Lyman Lemnitzer] and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war."

   ~ Source   James Bamford   Other links   ABC News Report   George Washington University Archive


   "The majority of the 9/11 Commissioners have now gone on record stating  
   that the
government lied, including its Chairman, Thomas H. Kean
   (Republican - former Governor of New Jersey), its Vice Chairman, Lee H.
   Hamilton (Democrat), both of whom claim 'obstruction of justice', and its
   Senior Legal Counsel, John Farmer Jr., who states, 'at some level of the
   government, at some point in time ... there was an agreement not to tell the
   truth about what happened.'"

            ~ Source


    "World events since the attacks of September 11, 2001 have not only been 
    predicted, but also planned, orchestrated and - as their architects would like to
    believe - controlled.
The current Central Asian war is not a response to terrorism, 
    nor is it a reaction to Islamic fundamentalism. It is in fact, in the words of one of 
    the most powerful men on the planet, the beginning of a final conflict before total
    world domination by the United States leads to the dissolution of all national
    governments. This, says Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member and former
    Carter National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, will lead to nation states
    being incorporated into a new world order, controlled solely by economic interests
    as dictated by banks, corporations and ruling elites concerned with the
    maintenance (by manipulation and war) of their power."
.
           
~ Source

   BBC Television announced the collapse of  WTC7 before it fell!

   www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNK1V6S2cbo&feature=related shows WTC7 still
   standing behind BBC's on-camera reporter
while she commented about this
   47-story building having already come down. Had someone at BBC been given  
   advance knowledge that WTC7 was going to be "pulled" by controlled demolition.


    JESSE VENTURA MAKES A HIGH-IMPACT ARGUMENT THAT 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE-JOB!

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhLhK0HeU6Q runs almost 45 minutes. Please ignore 
    the theatrical hype and focus on facts brought out.

.

.
Full investigative resources of the US government must be
committed to turning 911 inside-out to determine who
made what happen on that day in 2001. And make 
it a capital crime to subvert the investigation.
Lying should be treated as treason.
As in aiding America's enemies.
Foreign or domestic.

.

"... a bomb reportedly went off in the North Tower 
in the basement a few seconds before the first plane hit ..."

"... most of the WTC steel was quickly shipped overseas 
- before any independent investigation - and melted down ... 
(This is unprecedented and contrary to federal crime scene laws.)"

"... the Bush administration resisted the formation 
of the 9/11 Commission for 441 days ..."
More

"Reported by CNN, according to Ted Olson, wife Barbara Olson had called him from [American Airlines Flight 77], '...all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers...'. However, according to Flight Data provided by the NTSB, the Flight Deck Door was never opened in flight. How were the hijackers able to gain access to the cockpit, remove the pilots, and navigate the aircraft to the Pentagon
 if the Flight Deck Door remained closed?"

The following are treated as indented excerpts:

... if you look at the hole that was made in the Pentagon, the nose penetrated far enough so that there should have been wing marks on the walls of the Pentagon. I have been unable to find those wing marks. So where were they? Did this vessel -- vehicle, or whatever it was -- have wings? Apparently not, because if it had had wings, they would have made marks on the side of the Pentagon. ~ Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S. Army (Ret.); Member, Military Intelligence Hall of Fame.  Source  

The [9/11 Commission's] executive director [was] Philip Zelikow, who got a jump on the game by putting together a detailed outline of the final report just as they were starting to investigate! 

The outline was kept secret from others on the 80-member staff. Zelikow decided everything. After all, back in 1998 he'd co-written an essay on "catastrophic terrorism," which he foresaw "would be a watershed event in American history.... Like Pearl Harbor, this event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures, scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of civilians, detention of suspects, and use of deadly force." Sound familiar? Source

... Philip Zelikow ... was very closely associated with the Bush administration. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which issued the official reports on the destruction of the World Trade Center, is an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce, which means that, while writing these reports, it was an agency of the Bush-Cheney administration. We need an investigation that is free from such conflicts of interest. Source

The myth that the 9/11 commission report represents an adequate investigation into the events of 9/11 is perhaps best exposed by the commissioners themselves, 6 out of 10 of whom have questioned the commission and its conclusions personally (namely Kean and Hamilton, Kerrey, Roemer, Lehman and Cleland). Commission co-chairman Thomas Kean once famously remarked that the Commission was "set up to fail." Commission members considered bringing criminal charges against Pentagon officials who had deliberately lied to them about the military's complete lack of response on that day. One of the commissioners, Max Cleland, even resigned because the commission had been "deliberately compromised by the president of the United States." Source

[Transportation Secretary] Norman Minetta [told the] 9/11 Commission that Dick Cheney knew the exact flight path of Flight 93 (and did nothing).  Source

Mineta’s testimony contradicts the Government’s official narrative and the 9/11 Commission Report by revealing the fact that
Cheney knew about the aircraft approaching the Pentagon, long before the impact. This testimony was broadcast on C-Span.  Anyone is able to watch this video on the internet to confirm that these were in fact his exact words and watch him give this damaging testimony. The entire testimony is also available online though the 9/11 Commission Report’s official website where the entire transcript of the May 23rd, 2003 hearing is available. 

During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, “The plane is 50 miles out,” then  “The plane is 30 miles out,” and when it got down to “the plane is 10 miles out” the young man also said to the Vice President, “Do the orders still stand?” And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?”  From David Ray Griffin’s book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions. Source

So what [the Commission] did is they deleted Norman Minetta's testimony. There is no reference to it in the 9/11 Report. [Minetta] has Cheney in the bunker by 9:20, and the 9/11 Commission, in spite of knowing that, said that Cheney didn't get down there until about 9:58. So they lie by almost 45 minutes ... Source


Go here for YouTube videos on "911 Cheney".
.

.
Over the years, the panel member’s own comments have stated on several different occasions they were deliberately misled and deceived by the Pentagon, NORAD and other agencies.  Forget conspiracies, inside jobs, controlled demolitions and speculation on what hit the Pentagon, examine the investigation, how it was formed, stalled, blocked, strong-armed, lied to, restricted and compromised and it reveals legitimate concerns about the validity of the final report. 

Obstruction of Justice, Witness Tampering
and Committee Complaints
Source

The following is a small sample of the obstacles the investigation faced throughout the investigation. Obstruction and tampering from the highest levels undoubtedly hindered the investigation. Here are the issues:

*9/11 Commission Memo states the executive branch sent “minders” to intimidate witnesses and report on their actions. (9/11 Commission Memo, Oct. 2003)

*Whitehouse refuses to release 900 page congressional report describing how the attacks happened. (Miami Herald, May 2003)

*9/11 Commission does not receive requested interrogation tapes of detainees. (
NY Times, Dec. 2007)

*Interrogation tapes are destroyed (
ABC News, Dec. 2007)

*Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, chair and vice chair wrote an Oped piece in the NY Times stating the committee was stonewalled by the CIA and the investigation was obstructed government official failed to fully inform a lawfully constituted body. (
NY Times, Jan. 2008)

*Commissioner Max Cleland stated his displeasure with the committee making deals in regards to the documents they could view. He also stated the Bush administration attempted to slow walk the commission into irrelevancy. (
Salon, Nov. 2003)

*Committee member Tim Roemer stated "We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting," Roemer told CNN. "We were not sure of the intent, whether it was to deceive the commission or merely part of the fumbling bureaucracy." (
CNN, Aug. 2006)
Source

[The Oklahoma City bombing was an earlier atrocity event ~ April 19, 1995 ~ committed by "our" government, another false-flag operation intended to warp public opinion. Many hard facts revealed on the day of the bombing were then covered up by government and news media, but not completely. Consider the following:] 

Why did the Director of the University of Oklahoma’s Geological Survey, Dr. Charles Mankin, tell the media that according to two different seismographic records there were TWO blasts, the second approximately eight seconds after the first? Source
[Watch
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGSMzPHGk2s and www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWwrEEP8EBk&feature=related.]

[And, then, there's a letter sent to Sen. Trent Lott which includes this:]
The attached report contains conclusive proof that the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, was not caused solely by the truck bomb. Evidence shows that the massive destruction was primarily the result of four demolition charges placed at critical structural points at the third floor level. Source

When J.D. Cash, a journalist writing for the McCurtain County Gazette, tried to interview members of the [Oklahama City] Bomb Squad, Fire Department and Police, he was generally told by potential interviewees, "I saw a lot that day, I wish I hadn't. I have a wife, a job, a family, I've been threatened, we've been told not to talk about the devices." Source

"President Bush ordered the Washington, DC missile defense system to stand down in late July 2001. Bush also signed an executive order that told the FBI to back off their investigations of Muslims ..."

... agents said federal, state and local prosecutors were and still are being employed to frame innocent citizens on false charges to silence and neutralize patriot activists, whistleblowers and public officials.


The long-time intelligence official who spoke with us about Dr. Michael Berkland also immediately recognized the name of Dr. Malak as “another one of the ‘roster’ doctors called in to cover up suspicious deaths involving high government officials,” raising more serious questions about similar deaths involving government physicians.

The intelligence agent told us
“these physicians are also known in our circles as ‘suicide doctors,’ employed to cover up government-sponsored murders of public officials, legislators, political candidates, whistleblowers, journalists and activists attempting to expose government corruption—in other words, orchestrating a ‘suicide’ to cover up ‘red squad’ hits.” Source

Rumsfeld Buries Admission of Missing 2+ Trillion Dollars in 9/10/01 Press Conference. [Have you heard about this? This was the day before 9/11/01. Has any government official called for an investigation? Did Rumsfeld time his admission so it would be lost in the public mind due to WTC and Pentagon events?] Source

Even before 9/11, Cheney and Rumsfeld started weeding any intelligent life out of America’s military command structure.  Anyone who would ask hard questions or say “no” when asked to betray the United States, violate the Geneva Convention or be willing to wage aggressive war was cashiered. Source

[On 911, in New York City, tower] cores were obliterated.
There is no gravity collapse scenario that can account for the complete leveling of the massive columns of the towers' cores. The perimeter walls were shredded. No gravity collapse scenario can account for the ripping apart of the three-column by three-floor prefabricated column and spandrel plate units along their welds.

Nearly all the concrete was pulverized in the air, so finely that it blanketed parts of Lower Manhattan with inches of dust. In a gravity collapse, there would not have been enough energy to pulverize the concrete until it hit the ground, if then.
.
Parts of the towers were thrown 500 feet laterally.
The downward forces of a gravity collapse cannot account for the energetic lateral ejection of pieces.
.
Explosive events were visible before many floors had collapsed. Since overpressures are the only possible explanations for the explosive dust plumes emerging from the buildings, the top would have to be falling to produce them in a gravity collapse. But in the South Tower collapse, energetic dust ejections are first seen while the top is only slightly tipping, not falling.  Source

Stanley Hilton was a senior advisor to Sen. Bob Dole (R) and has personally known Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz for decades. This courageous man has risked his professional reputation, and possibly his life, to get this information out to people: "We have evidence both documentary as well as witness sworn statements from undercover former FBI agents, FBI informants, etc., that other officials in the Pentagon and the military and the Air Force that deal with the fact that there were many drills, many rehearsals for 9/11 before it happened. "We do have some incriminating documents that Bush personally ordered 9/11 events. It was well planned.Source

The former head of the Star Wars missile defense program under Presidents Ford and Carter has gone public to say that the official version of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory and his main suspect for the architect of the attack is Vice President Dick Cheney. Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF, ret., flew 101 combat missions in Vietnam. He is the recipient of the Eisenhower Medal, the George F. Kennan Peace Prize, the President’s Medal of Veterans for Peace, the Society of Military Engineers Gold Medal (twice), six Air Medals, and dozens of other awards and honors. His Ph.D. is in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from Caltech. He chaired 8 major international conferences, and is one of the country’s foremost experts on National Security. Source

The two questions that the congress will not ask . . . is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush's watch when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did they allow it to happen? Source

The former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under the Reagan Administration and a highly decorated Vietnam veteran and Colonel has gone on the record to voice his doubts about the official story of 9/11 - calling it "the dog that doesn't hunt." [Col. Ronald D. Ray] questioned the feasibility of having a budget of half a trillion dollars a year yet not even being able to defend the Pentagon. Ray detailed historical examples of the use of false-flag operations carried out by the US government, in particular Israel's attempted sinking of the USS Liberty, which LBJ allowed to happen in an effort to blame Egypt and kickstart a war. Ray (pictured below) espoused his complete distrust of the legitimacy of the official story behind 9/11. Source


Col. Ronald D. Ray

Scholars and professionals with various kinds of expertise --- including architects, engineers, firefighters, intelligence officers, lawyers, medical professionals, military officers, philosophers, religious leaders, physical scientists, and pilots --- have spoken out about radical discrepancies between the official account of the 9/11 attacks and what they, as independent researchers, have learned. They have established beyond any reasonable doubt that the official account of 9/11 is false  and that, therefore, the official "investigations" have really been cover-up operations. Source

If the official story was a tapestry of lies, and the September 11th attack was a meticulously engineered fraud perpetrated by officials sworn to protect us, people would naturally have a difficult time confronting that reality. To reject a story so thoroughly entrenched in consensus reality means both ridicule from others and embarrassment at having been manipulated. Nonetheless, people who have not questioned the official 9-11 story owe it to themselves to consider what kind of world is possible if the official story were to fall apart. All of the attacks on privacy, dignity, civil liberties, justice, peace, and government accountability enacted in the name of fighting terrorism since the attack would become completely indefensible. The corporate media would be thoroughly discredited for its role as propagandist for the perpetrators. A truth commission or some such body would be empowered to find the truth, and people throughout our society would distance themselves from the perpetrators and all that they represented in ruthlessness, duplicity, unaccountability, and arrogance. Truthfulness and independent thinking would be newly valued. Neglect of the people we punished for a crime they had nothing to do with would give way to contrition, sympathy, and reconstruction aid. And there would be vast resources to apply to such projects once the military budget was adjusted to fit newly perceived realities, in a world no longer dominated by the merchants of deception and fear. That might not be such a bad thing. If the attack was a fraud, would you want to be the last to know? If you haven't re-examined the official story, why not take another look? We have nothing to lose but an Orwellian nightmare, in which an unaccountable few plunder the earth's natural resources, and sap the human spirit through engineered fear. Source

One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9/11 issue is so important to America. But [the Bush White House] wants to cover it up. Source

We are the people.  We are sovereign.  We are the patriots.  The whole world is with us.  Never allow anyone to intimidate you into silence.  Wake up, America!  It’s time to speak truth to power.  God bless America, and God save us from the traitors in our government.  

This war has nothing to do with national security or freedom or democracy or human rights or protecting our allies or weapons of mass destruction or defeating terrorism or disarming Iraq.  

It has to do with money.  It has to do with oil.  And it has to do with raw imperial power.  It is based on a pack of lies.  And it is wrong.
  Those who forced this war on an unwilling world are guilty of violating the U.S. Constitution, the UN Charter, and international law.  What they have done is illegal, immoral, unconstitutional … and TREASON. 
Source

Of course Bush knew about the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people, because he needed this war on terrorism.   Source    Colonel Steve Butler's Letter   Related Source 

[George Galloway, Member of Parliament, lambastes U.S Senate:] YouTube Segment

[A 9/11 widow retained] a prominent lawyer, a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, who served with distinction under both Democrats and Republicans and was once a strong candidate for the governor's seat. The attorney [filed] a 62-page complaint in federal district court (including 40 pages of prima facie evidence) charging that "President Bush and officials including, but not limited to Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Ashcroft and Tenet":
1.) had adequate foreknowledge of 911 yet failed to warn the [country] or attempt to prevent it;
2.) have since been covering up the truth of that day;
3.) have therefore abetted the murder of plaintiff's husband and violated the Constitution and multiple laws of the United States; and
4.) are thus being sued under the Civil RICO (Racketeering, Influence, and Corrupt Organization) Act for malfeasant conspiracy, obstruction of justice and wrongful death.
Source   Widow's letter to G.W. Bush

So many 9/11 witnesses or people who would seem to have knowledge of the cover up have been mysteriously dying. This all can't be a coincidence. Source

There is nothing new in a government lying to their people to start a war. Indeed because most people prefer living in peace to bloody and horrific death in war, any government that desires to initiate a war usually lies to their people to create the illusion that support for the war is the only possible choice they can make. Source

Thank you for visiting The Journal of 9/11 Studies, a peer-reviewed, open-access, electronic-only journal, covering the whole of research related to the events of 11 September, 2001. Many fields of study are represented in the journal, including Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics and Psychology. Source

1104 architectural and engineering professionals and 7160 other supporters including A&E students have signed the petition demanding of Congress a truly independent investigation. The petition is open to everyone.  
                          
Sign the Petition
Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth
Press Conference, San Francisco, February 19, 2010:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=R35O_QQP8Vw Part 1

www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1Mnt2pgbCw Part 2

www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrzyFXC1PsQ Part 3

www.youtube.com/watch?v=VC8Qk_gJ_N0 Part 4

www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0MLjGL2PN0 Part 5

www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZFDsAH-CLA Part 6

Slide show

Source
.

Selected 911 video records

www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=E4D175F4688986FB
[Loose Change, a comprehensive 911 documentary in 12 parts]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=MY7BCXew0UI&NR=1
[Perimeter steel wall columns and core columns were both load bearing.]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzJehD0eSYQ
[Vehicles were destroyed, even melted, by WTC event.]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=44M09IQTRwA&NR=1
[More footage of vehicle destruction.]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=uF97uHGJM_Q&NR=1
[Still more vehicle footage.]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw&feature=related
Bombs, explosions, secondary explosions, explosive devices....how many more times do we need to hear these words being said by 9/11 witnesses before we start asking questions about what really happened on that awful day?

The Center for Public Integrity

www.projects.publicintegrity.org/WarCard/
Following 9/11, President Bush and seven top officials of his administration waged a carefully orchestrated campaign of misinformation about the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq.

United States Government's 9/11 Commission Report

www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf

Jesse Ventura, former governor of Minnesota and former Navy SEAL

www.today.msnbc.msn.com/id/35728268/ns/today-today_books
Our government engaged in a massive cover-up of what really happened, including its own ties to the hijackers. Unanswered questions remain about how the towers were brought down, and whether a plane really struck the Pentagon.
The Bush Administration either knew about the plan and allowed it to proceed, or they had a hand in it themselves.

www.bigeye.com/911conspiracy_theory_ventura.htm
[Video in 6 parts]

Attack on America dot Net

www.attackonamerica.net/proofofcontrolleddemolitionatwtc.htm
Student pilots from Saudi Arabia and other Arab nations were enrolled in flight schools in Venice, Florida and other locations. The flight school in Venice is linked to CIA drug running operations, according to one researcher.

Ted Gunderson, former head of FBI operations in LA, Dallas, Memphis

www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhMcii8smxk&feature=_embedded#
... the CIA had to know about it, the FBI had to know about it, Mossad had to know about it, MI5-British Intelligence had to know about it ...



Pentagon's C-Ring exit hole. Click here for speculative comment.


Journal of 911 Studies

www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf
The temperatures required for the molten sphere-formation and evaporation of materials as observed in the WTC dust are significantly higher than temperatures associated with the burning of jet fuel and office materials in the WTC buildings.
The temperature of the fire at the WTC was not unusual, and it was most definitely not capable of melting steel.

Amazon's 9/11 E-books Available for your Kindle or PC

www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=node%3D154606011
&field-keywords=9%2F11&x=12&y=15
or click here
[Some titles question the official story and others do not.]

World Trade Center Seven dot Net, created by Jim Hoffman

www.WTC7.net
Is [the official] story true? Its central assumptions have never been tested by an official government body whose members lack obvious conflicts of interest. There are numerous red flags in the official story, which require a long series of highly improbable coincidences. Questioning that story is an act of responsible citizenship.

www.911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/thermitics_made_simple.html
As this simplified summary of the findings of the paper Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe shows, the distinctive red-gray chips found consistently in dust samples from the destroyed Twin Towers are clearly an advanced engineered pyrotechnic material. It is not even remotely possible that the material could have been formed spontaneously through any random process such as the total destruction of the Twin Towers. Nor is it possible that the material was present in the Towers for some innocent reason.

www.911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/bodies.html
The aircraft impacts and fires in all probability would not have destroyed a single body beyond positive identification. Nor have building collapses ever been known to destroy human remains beyond recognition. However, the buildings were destroyed in a manner that converted most of their non-metallic contents to homogeneous dust, including the bodies.

www.911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/gold.html
A King's Ransom in Precious Metals Seems to Have Disappeared.

www.911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/freefall.html
The roofline of WTC1 (The North Tower) begins dropping with sudden onset and accelerates uniformly downward at about 64% of the acceleration of gravity (g) until it disappears into the dust. This means it is meeting resistance equal to about 36% of its weight. The implication of this, however, is that the force it is exerting on the lower section of the building is also only 36% of the weight of the falling section. This is much less than the force it would exert if it were at rest. The acceleration data thus prove that the falling top section of the building cannot be responsible for the destruction of the lower section of the building.

www.911research.wtc7.net/essays/demolition/seismic.html
... the seismic records do support the case for controlled demolition, but in a way that has been overlooked.

www.911research.wtc7.net/wtc/background/owners.html
The World Trade Center complex came under the control of a private owner for the first time only in mid-2001, having been built and managed by the Port Authority as a public resource. The complex was leased to a partnership of Silverstein Properties and Westfield America. The new controllers acquired a handsome insurance policy for the complex including a clause that would prove extremely valuable: in the event of a terrorist attack, the partnership could collect the insured value of the property, and be released from their obligations under the 99-year lease.

www.911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/index.html
"1 and 2 World Trade Center used the so-called tube within a tube architecture, in which closely-spaced external columns form the building's perimeter walls, and a dense bundle of columns forms its core. Tall buildings have to resist primarily two kinds of forces: lateral loading (horizontal force) due mainly to the wind, and gravity loading (downward force) due to the building's weight."

www.911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/audiotape.html
Palmer called for a pair of engine companies to fight the fires. The fact that veteran firefighters showed no sign of fear or panic, and had a coherent plan for fighting the fire, contradicts the official explanation of the collapses that the fires were so hot and extensive that they weakened the steel structure.

911 Truth dot Org

www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041112144051451
The buildings should have easily withstood the thermal stress caused by pools of burning jet fuel.

www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646
The top 40 reasons to doubt the official story of September 11, 2001.

www.911truth.org/downloads/911_peace_and_justice.pdf
We simply cannot ignore the fact that elements of the US government at the highest levels may have committed treason and mass murder by purposely allowing 9/11 to happen.

www.911truth.org/downloads/911_peace_and_justice.pdf
Peace, Military, Celebrity Leaders urge U.S. peace and justice groups: DEMAND 9/11 truth!

911 Review dot Org

www.911review.org/brad.com/batcave/missingwings.htm
Detailed analysis of the debris field, physical damage, and other factors in the alleged impact of a Boeing 757 on the Pentagon building on the morning of September 11, 2001 reveals an almost complete absence of debris expected from such an event. (Elliott 2003) The initial (pre-collapse) hole made by the alleged impact on the ground floor of Wedge One of the building is too small to admit an entire Boeing 757.

www.911review.org/brad.com/pentagongraphics.html
[The alleged Islamist hijackers could] have chosen to 'decapitate' the Pentagon by striking where Rumsfeld's office and the NMCC office [are], where the building was still fully occupied and unreinforced, and where there [were] no convenient obstacles to leave the footprints of a 757.

Link Found on David Ray Griffin dot Com

www.radiodujour.com/pdf/voices-book.pdf
40 phone-calls changed the world that day—but were they real? The U.S. government’s amazing 9/11 evidence says not. ~ Rowland Morgan

Visit Amazon's David Ray Griffin Page

Legendary Trial Attorney Gerry Spence 

www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20040525224251221
[David Ray Griffin's book, The New Pearl Harbor] is as full of research and authoritative notes as a field full of springtime daisies. The author raises frightening questions, and the questions beg for answers. One thing we can conclude for certain. The events surrounding 9-11, both before and after, cannot be simply swept under the rug of conventional wisdom unless we allow it. This book gives us a foundation to discover the truth, one that we may not wish to hear.

Wikipedia, the Online Encyclopedia

www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories
Some of the conspiracy theories about the September 11 attacks do not involve representational strategies typical of many conspiracy theories that establish a clear dichotomy between good and evil, or guilty and innocent. Instead, they call up gradations of negligence and complicity. Matthias Bröckers, an early proponent of such theories, dismisses the official account of the September 11 attacks as being itself a conspiracy theory that seeks "to reduce complexity, disentangle what is confusing," and "explain the inexplicable".

The September 11 Digital Archive

www.911digitalarchive.org/gallery_index.php
The September 11 Digital Archive uses electronic media to collect, preserve, and present the history of September 11, 2001 and its aftermath. The Archive contains more than 150,000 digital items, a tally that includes more than 40,000 emails and other electronic communications, more than 40,000 first-hand stories, and more than 15,000 digital images.

Team Infinity 

www.stopcovertwar.com/McVeigh.html
[The Oklahoma City bombing may have been a government-perpetrated event which preceded the 9/11 atrocities. Consider the following:] Retired Air Force Brigadier General Benton K. Partin, former commander of the Air Force Armament Technology Laboratory, a 25-year expert in the design and development of bombs, urged Senators and Congressmen to delay the destruction of the Murrah building site. Partin stated in a news release, "When I first saw the picture of the truck bomb’s asymmetrical damage to the Federal building in Oklahoma, my immediate reaction was that the pattern of damage would have been technically impossible without supplementary demolition charges at some of the reinforced concrete bases inside the building, a standard demolition technique." Partin further explained that "reinforced concrete targets in large buildings are hard targets to blast. I know of no way possible to reproduce the apparent building damage through simply a truck bomb effort." [Also, please visit:]
www.911review.com/precedent/decade/okc.html
www.physics911.net/generalpartinreport

John Kaminski

www.serendipity.li/wot/best_911_sites.htm
If you were to read every story on every website mentioned in this post, we wouldn't hear from you for years. [Some links do not work.]

What Really Happened dot Com

www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/9-11BasicQuestions.html
Michael Rivero's long list of 9/11 questions that deserve honest answers.

Major General Smedley Darlington Butler, U.S. Marine Corps

www.insightcourse.net/lessons/04a_military_industrial_complex

  

One of the most highly decorated generals from World War I [twice awarded the Medal of Honor], Smedley Butler, performed many heroic deeds in his 33 years of service in the U.S. military. Yet as he retired, he learned about major hidden manipulations which push governments into war. General Butler's timeless classic War is a Racket exposes some of the little known root causes of war. Please read the highly revealing two-page summary of this powerful book ...

President Dwight David Eisenhower

www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY
[His famous speech in which he warned against the military-industrial complex.]

Andrew G. Marshall

www.journalof911studies.com/letters/b/MarshallMilitaryIndComplexPNAC.pdf
... it is necessary to now take a look back at the history and role that the military-industrial complex has played in all our lives, and continues to play today.

New York City Police Department

www.toxic911.blogspot.com/search/label/Radiation%20monitor
... proposed legislation would make it a misdemeanor for anyone in New York City to own, or use, any device that measures chemical, biological or radiological contamination. Banned devices could include smoke and carbon-monoxide detectors, Geiger counters, and any device that collects and analyzes air or water samples, for contamination without first obtaining a permit from NYPD.

Jerry Mazza, Associate Editor, Online Journal

www.groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/ etcetera
Did [New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani] want all evidence gone of aerosolized metals, and explosive materials like thermite, that created this carcinogenic mixture of "dust," more like a gray sky-soup of atomized concrete, iron, plastics, wood, rubber, wire, flesh, blended into particulates, that would settle and calcify in the lungs and other body tissue? The concrete's 200,000 gallons of water was literally vaporized. Thus, in order to understand the enormity of these explosions,
read what Dr. Ed Ward, MD, reports ... concerning ... Government's Usage of Atomic Bombs. [See immediately below.]

Ed Ward, M.D.

www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/09/25/ward.htm
The factual evidence indicates that our government is using and has used 3rd or possibly 4th generation hydrogen bombs domestically and internationally. The evidence for international usage is not quite as strong as the domestic usage, but when domestic usage is considered, the international usage seems inescapable.
The process of exclusion based on the known facts leaves only one viable option for the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings - a relatively pure hydrogen bomb.

Just some of the facts are: widespread cancer in the responders, molten steel, melted cars, steel beams hurled hundreds of feet, aerosolized metals, vaporized steel witnessed and video, aerosolized and pulverized concrete, elevated tritium levels, vanishing (vaporized) victims, only sliver fragments of victims on roof tops, EMP - Electro Magnetic Pulse effects on communications, hundreds of eyewitness testimony of ancillary explosions by heroic rescuers and victims, massive dispersal of debris, demolition expert states hydrogen bomb needed for this type of demolition, audio of a massive explosion prior to collapse, video of ancillary explosions, audio of ancillary explosions, significant reduction in debris pile, ancillary thermate found in wreckage, shockwave of a mini yield nuclear blast knocked people off their feet, vaporization of 200,000 gallons of water, removal of wreckage without investigation, only remnants of fire in one tower minutes after the plane collision, unprecedented history of 3 skyscrapers collapsing secondary to fire, early miscalculation stating WTC building 7 'pulled', towers fall at demolition or free fall speed, foreknowledge of WTC 7 immediate collapse, slow-motion video evidence of plane appendage with smoke and explosion immediately prior to impact of both planes, unprecedented NORAD non response to variant flights, FEMA drill scheduled for same day, military "exercise" of exactly what was taking place to prevent NORAD response, most of NORAD protection planes sent far away in another "exercise" to prevent response, prevention of examination of wreckage by those assigned to investigate, seismic evidence of a mini yield nuclear explosion, Cheney takes over NORAD response command, Cheney prevents NORAD response, WTC towers designed for 757 collision and fire, 911 used falsely for previously planned war, government fabrication of "evidence" correlation for starting war, hundreds of people found themselves trapped by locked doors and missing escape routes above and below the impact zone, and not all inclusively, but finally, Bush brands anyone noting any of these facts a terrorist.

History Commons Timeline of 6,314 events 
(Including lead-up to and following 911)

www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline

911 Review dot Com 

A Personal Decision

by Kevin Ryan

EDITOR'S NOTE: Kevin Ryan was fired from his position at Underwriters Laboratories (UL) after writing this letter to Dr. Frank Gayle at the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) concerning its investigation of the collapses of the World Trade Center skyscrapers.

Have you ever found yourself caught between several hundred million people and their most cherished lies? After writing a letter to a government scientist, pleading with him to clarify a report of his work, I found myself in just that situation. The letter was circulated on the internet and for a brief time I became a reluctant celebrity. Of course I stand behind what I wrote, although it was originally intended as a personal message, not an open letter. Since many have asked for clarification, here is my message to all.

To me, the report in question represents a decision point, not just for the US, but for humanity as a whole. We're at a point where we must decide if we will live consciously, or literally give up our entire reality for a thin veneer of lies. In the US these lies include cheap propaganda that passes for journalism, police-state measures that promise security, and mountains of debt that paint a picture of wealth. Additionally we've adopted many implicit self-deceptions, like the idea that we'll always enjoy a limitless share of the world's resources, no matter where these are located or who might disagree.

All people lie to themselves. It's one of the most important things we have yet to accept about our own nature. We lie to ourselves to justify our past actions, to protect our self-image, and to promote ourselves relative to others. This lying is at the root of many of our problems (e.g. nationalism and racism). Until we see this, and strive to understand if not control it, the resulting problems will continue unchecked and the outcome will be certain. Any organism or society that makes self-deception its modus operandi will make many bad, and ultimately fatal, decisions. The day will come when we are collectively fooling ourselves in such a way that we essentially trade everything we have for what's behind our fantasy curtain. It appears that day is near.

The official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a key part of our current self-deception. More importantly, this story may be our last chance to see just how critical our situation is so that we can all stop, and begin working together to solve the real problems we face. These problems, for the US and the world as a whole, amount to a growing storm of factors including environmental changes, resource depletion, and growth in resource usage.[1,2] Undoubtedly the secret Energy Taskforce report of May 2001 would verify this, and help us to understand that our government is responding to some of these threats with a carefully laid out plan. This plan assumes that people cannot rise above their own natural, ego-based self-deception, and therefore few of us will survive the coming storm. In essence, they're betting against us.

Anyone who honestly looks at the evidence has difficulty finding anything in the official story of 9/11 that is believable. It's not just one or two strange twists or holes in the story, the whole thing is bogus from start to end.[3] In my previous job I was in a position to question one part, the collapse of three tall buildings due to fire. But this isn't really a chemistry or engineering problem, and may be best approached initially through statistics.

The three WTC buildings in question weren't all designed the same way and weren't all hit by airplanes. The only thing they seemed to have in common were relatively small and manageable fires, as indicated by the work of firefighters right up to the moment of collapse. From the government's report we know that only a small percentage of the supporting columns in each of the first two buildings were severed, and that the jet fuel burned off in just a few minutes.

To follow the latest 'leading hypothesis', what are the odds that all the fireproofing fell off in just the right places, even far from the point of impact? Without much test data, let's say it's one in a thousand. And what are the odds that the office furnishings converged to supply highly directed and (somehow) forced-oxygen fires at very precise points on the remaining columns? Is it another one in a thousand? What is the chance that those points would then all soften in unison, and give way perfectly, so that the highly dubious 'progressive global collapse' theory could be born? I wouldn't even care to guess. But finally, with well over a hundred fires in tall buildings through history, what are the chances that the first, second and third incidents of fire-induced collapse would all occur on the same day? Let's say it's one in a million. Considering just these few points we're looking at a one in a trillion chance, using generous estimates and not really considering the third building (no plane, no jet fuel, different construction).

How convenient that our miraculous result, combined with several other trains of similarly unlikely events, gives us reason to invade the few most strategically important lands for the production of oil and natural gas. As I said, this is not about chemistry or engineering. Our continued dependence on this highly improbable story means that we have a desperate need to believe it. It is, in fact, a psychology problem.

Solving the problem is a personal challenge, and involves at least three-steps. First, we have to admit we were wrong, and that we were fooled. This is not easy for most people, but congratulations to the neo-cons for noticing that their political opponents seem to be least able to admit they were wrong on any significant issue. Secondly, we have to see that terrorism is actually much worse than we feared because the terrorists are in charge. Such a pause on a national scale would be dramatic to say the least. If we get to the third step we begin to realize the scope of change necessary to move forward in a conscious manner. Obviously the US government must be substantially changed and/or forgiven. New cooperative, multinational agreements would need to be implemented immediately.

If you make it through step one and care enough about people to work for step three, you may face ridicule and isolation. You may lose your income and some friends, but if we continue down the same path there's a real chance you're going to lose those anyway. On the upside you may be able to hold on to some sense of integrity. The only thing you can be certain of is that we're all in this together. No matter how you voted, what credentials or positions you hold, or what faith you have in people, you will face the consequences of our collective self-deceptions. Now is the time for each of us to decide between a stormy reality and what's behind the fantasy curtain.

FOOTNOTES:


1.
http://www.energybulletin.net/primer.php
2. http://www.worldwatch.org/press/news/2005/05/12/
3. http://www.septembereleventh.org/newsarchive/2005-05-22-571pglie.php
4. http://www.peakoil.net/uhdsg/UppsalaProtocol.html

Airlines barred from questioning FBI in 9/11 suit 

www.judgepedia.org/index.php/New_York_judicial_news
New York, July 17, 2009: Federal judge Alvin Hellerstein dismissed a lawsuit filed by major airlines to seek rights to question FBI agents about the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

The lawsuit was part of a plan for the airlines to question FBI agents and seek access to evidence related to the September 11th attacks. The airlines who sued the FBI wanted to prove in court that the government was inadequately prepared in preventing the terrorist attacks which killed over 3,000 people.


Sign the Petition
.


"...we have a duty to be kept informed.
We are the ultimate authority, after all, in a democracy."
Walter Cronkite

Send Email to Webmaster

We salute the efforts of all dedicated,
PATRIOTIC 9/11 researchers!
America's future is
on the line.


This site supports www.OathKeepers.Org

"Oath Keepers is a non-partisan association of currently serving military, reserves,
National Guard, veterans, Peace Officers, and Fire Fighters who will fulfill the Oath we swore, 
with the support of like minded citizens who take an Oath to stand with us, to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, so help us God. Our Oath is to the Constitution."
Our motto is "Not on our watch!"


More 9/11 Links

http://www.wanttoknow.info/060903time.911conspiracies

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVH5jm06pJY&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzbVn3o8JNE&NR=1

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/03/08/
gordon-duff-911-and-current-attempts-to-cover-up-an-american-holocaust/

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/cutter.html

http://www.bushstole04.com/911/9-11-01.htm

http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/nist,femareports,911structuralengineerin

http://www.infowars.com/willie-nelson-twin-towers-were-imploded-on-911/

http://www.ae911truth.org/downloads/29_Structural-Civil_Engineers_2009-06-17.pdf

http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/tenants1.html


RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE

GO TO LIST OF MORE WEBSITES

SEND EMAIL


Notice of fair use

This website contains some copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by copyright owners. 911Review.Net is making such material available in an effort to advance enhanced understanding of economic, democratic, scientific, environmental, political, human rights, and social justice issues relelated to the 9/11 attacks. The publisher believes that this constitutes a fair use of such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Such material on this web site is published without profit in defense of the Republic and our sacred American ideals. Links to sources of excerpted material are displayed with intent to send viewers to those sources.
Copyright owners wishing to have their excerpted material deleted from this site are asked to
send email to the publisher.
.


A government that will not answer questions about the people's business
and that will not conduct real-thing investigations into heinous crimes
is not a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

Democracy is not a spectator sport.
Challenge abuses of delegated powers. Challenge tyranny. Challenge treason.
Challenge stupidity. Challenge arrogance. Challenge corruption. 

"Our nation is founded on the principle of rule with the consent of the governed. 
Because We The People do not consent to be lied to, a government that lies rules without 
the consent of the governed, and ruling without the consent of the governed is slavery." 
Source

 


Search Engine Optimization and SEO Tools

 

Website Visitor Counter
ProFlowers.com

7121